For the last couple of years, I have made my IRA contributions in a lump sum rather than dollar-cost averaging them over the course of a year. When I first started working, I was making a high enough salary that I wouldn't know until December, when my firm distributes year-end bonuses, whether my Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) was too high to be able to contribute to a Roth IRA. Last year, my AGI ended up being too high for a Roth so I opened a traditional IRA, with an eye to converting it to a Roth in 2010.
I started off 2008 knowing my income would once again be too high to contibute to a Roth, but I held off on contributing for two reasons.
The first reason was habit: ever since I opened my Roth when I was in high school, I've contributed in a lump sum at the end of the year. Every year when I walked through my income taxes with my Dad, he'd ask me how much I had to contribute to my Roth, and he'd top it off. I think it was just less of a logisitcal headache for him that way and made the look-back accounting easier, and it never occurred to me to contribute over the course of the year.
But the second reason I held off was that my IRAs, both the Roth and the traditional, are with Vanguard, which has somewhat hefty minimum initial investments. Last year I put my total $4,000 contribution into the Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX--I love calling it that, it sounds so minxy), Vanguard's S&P 500 Index. That fund has a minimum initial investment of $3,000, as did several of the other funds I was looking at. I planned to put my 2008 contribution into another fund, probably Vanguard's Total Stock Market Fund, and depending on how much money I had in VFINX, potentially spread that money a little thinner into three funds, with the third being an overseas market fund.
That won't happen now, since VFINX has lost so much money this year. As of yesterday, my initial $4,000 investment has become $2,755. But c'est la vie. I'm in my twenties, baby.
So I waited until I had at least $3,000 set aside to make a 2008 contribution. That happened with my September paycheck, since I didn't set any money aside in the early part of the year until I could build up the emergency fund again after my emergency furnace purchase. As of October 1, I had $3,160 set aside for an IRA contribution. I'll continue setting money aside, and I plan to contribute the whole $5,000 I'm eligible for.
But it just so happened that acheiving my $3,000 benchmark roughly coincided with the stockmarket going up in flames. It is, so I hear, a great time to buy.
So of course, I didn't buy. I sat on it for about a week, dithering about whether I should go ahead and throw down or sit on my liquidity. Just in case. And I could do a single lump contribution at the last minute. But it's such a good time to buy! But I like my big fat savings account balance! But it's such a good time to buy! You know: My mother! My sister! My mother! My sister!
Anyway, I pulled the trigger today. $3,160 is now floating somewhere on the internet between HSBC and Vanguard. We'll see how my reluctant run at market timing shakes out. I am left with a soggy feeling that no matter which route I chose I would have ended up feeling stupid and regretful about it later on. Better or stupid, regretful, and bold. (Yes, I tolerate risk somwhat well, why do you ask?)
10.08.2008
Drama In Real Life: Inadvertent Market Timing
Cheers,
f.f.
at
2:32 PM
Labels: economy, retirement
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Good Girl!!! Lucky that you're in your 20's AND the market is on sale extra low. Even if it goes lower in the long run you'll make out like a bandit! When you hit my age and look back at what you originally invested and what it's worth...even if you missed the bottom slightly, you'll be happy you didn't miss it cause it was on it's way back up instead. I keep telling my brother it's better to dollar cost average a little bit every month while the market is sliding and lose a bit on paper, than to wait until you "KNOW" the market is going up and miss the prime buying opportunity at the bottom.
Brava! You won't regret it. Even if the market drops a bit further before its eventual recovery, you bought at a whole lot better of a time than during any of the previous 10 months.
I lump sum into my Roth IRA (at Vanguard as well!) every January, so my contribution is worth decidedly less right now that it was. But perhaps it will still be a good time to buy when I make my 2009 contribution in just a few months.
In the meantime, to console myself, I've boosted my 401k contribution and added almost $1000 over the last month to a Vanguard index outside my Roth (LifeStrategy Growth, in case anyone cares).
I'm not so sure about "...inadvertent market timing" but you might check out Price Wave Analysis (PWA)at www.itspage.com In nine years a buy and hold investment lost about fifty percent while PWA users would have gained 1,080 percent. Losing money to the market if you don't have to doesn't make sense; and you don't have to.
Post a Comment